|

          |
| If
your national flag isn't shown, it's because you haven't written to
ModelFlight yet . . . ! |
            |
| Every time I send
out the usual ModelFlight reminder, a few messages get returned
as 'undeliverable' because the e-mail address is no longer valid, and so I have to remove the entry from my address book. If
you have previously been receiving the reminder but are no longer
getting it for this or any other reason, but wish to do so, then please
send me an e-mail simply headed 'Lost & Found' (or whatever!) and I
will be delighted to restore you to the mailing list - I don't want to
lose you! |
| My thanks to Brian
Collins, Gordon
Cook, Geoff
Graham, Phil Hayward, Ian Nelson, Terry Pollock, Ian Savage, and Tony Whiteley for their kind comments in respect of the last issue of ModelFlight. Welcome to Colin
Bosch, "Casey", Norman Harris, Jim Kiger, Obec Klenčí, S. McCullough, Gary Moscardini, Ian Wheeler.
|
|
Brian wants to push off!
|
|
I have a question which I need an answer to. I
wondered if you can put it to your readers.
I have just bought a Multiplex
Twinjet and wanted to hot it up a little!! so I also bought two Graupner
Speed 480 motors. However I have been told that they have to be re-timed
in order to run backwards as per pusher mode. There are no instructions
telling you how to do this. Can you please ask how it's done or even better
let me know of someone who can do it for me.
Thank you for a great insight into this
great hobby!
|
|
Well, I asked Graham McAllister of Graham McAllister Designs what he
thought - his company specialises in all things to do with electric model
planes.
Graham says this is a tricky situation - the simple answer is that
Brian should
have been sold the Speed 480L (for left-hand) motors - these are for the
TwinJet and similar models.
The 480 motors are pre-timed - in other words they are not set at zero
timing like the basic 400 and 600 motors - therefore if you run them in reverse
the power and efficiency is lower than when they run forwards.
Graham says these motors can be re-timed, but it does mean rotating the
backplate which is held in place by bent metal tabs, rather a brute force
operation - indeed, he says that personally he would not tackle it.
Any chance of you exchanging the motors,
Brian, rather than risk messing them up, I
wonder? Or buy replacements and hold the others in stock for future use . . .
?
|
|
Gordon Cook, Chairman of Test Valley MFC, UK
(my club)
Hi Reg,
Well done on 50 episodes! Shall we see the next 50? I hope so. I liked
the piece for beginners, it's so important to steer folk the right way
in the first place.
. . . That's it, see you soon, and if not have a great Xmas. See you at
Neville's sale on New Year's Day.
'Neville's' is our local model shop and
it's a bit of a standing joke that he NEVER has a sale! Folk are always
threatening to put up SALE notices on his door whilst he's away on
holiday, but we're not sure if he could stand the shock, let alone the
other customers! Still, he's a
good guy and he does give us discount!
|
|
Jim
Kiger, USA:
Please see my site at
http://home.pacbell.net/fraze/replicraft.html
My plan-sets are used by world class RC modelers and for museum
quality models as well as full size aircraft.
May I have a link to your site?
Jim Kiger (REPLICRAFT)
Delighted to oblige, Jim. See
more about Jim's plans on site seeing. |
| Terry Pollock - re Mark Oakes and
his Lo-Boy wing problem
Click
this thumbnail to read Mark's original query
Hi Reg
Congratulations on edition 50. This "thing" goes from strength
to strength.
I read the post box request from Mark Oates re the Lo Boy. We have had a
couple of these at our club and they weren't the most liked model
around. They tended to be a bit twitchy. However a close friend had one
and it definitely had a nice degree (if you pardon the pun) of DIhedral
in the wing.
I suggest that Mark either replaces the
wing or "re-engineers" it. This could be achieved by:
- cutting it in half
- introducing a wedge of hard
1/4 inch balsa to produce dihedral and
- re-adhere
the wings.
I don't know what degree of dihedral
would have been defined on the plan. However the fact that it is a low
wing, symmetrical wing section (if I remember correctly) and meant for
"go where you point it" aerobatics, I would limit the dihedral
to no more than 2 degrees. A wing brace at the main spare would be a
good idea. He may need to channel alongside the existing brace if the
existing one can't be removed. A couple of spot dowel braces near the
front and rear would also be of assistance. A good healthy fibreglass
wing patch wrapped completely around the join and spreading out a couple
of inches on either side of center would also provide support.
I hope that this information is of assistance.
Regards
Terry
PS: In case I don't get to write again in the next week (I haven't
finished #50 yet), a very happy Christmas and a prosperous new year to
you and your family. Many thanks for the enjoyment that ModelFlight has
given me over the past twelve months or so that I have been reading it.
I look forward to continuing our communications in the new year - TP
Thanks, Terry, for your
encouragement re this 'thing' called ModelFlight! To me, it still
feels more like a club than a magazine - I get so much friendly
correspondence and feed-back, and the level of participation by others
than me seems to avoid the 'we're the experts' feel of some of the
magazines (although, after all, that's partly what we expect from the
mags).
|
| . . . and here's Mark's
response to Terry's suggestions which I sent to him by e-mail
T hanks
very much for the e-mail, since speaking to you I have been speaking
to a manufacturer of foam wings who just happens to have a pattern for
the Lo-Boy. However, before I go that route what I'll think I'll do is
to cut the wings and put some dihedral in - how about if I get
some before, during and after pictures, would that interest you?
. . . to which the
answer is a definite YES PLEASE! I reckon it will be interesting to
see such a major bit of 'surgery' and will help to build confidence
for others of us in tackling such challenges (provided it works!). |
| Ian Nelson was very encouraging .
. .
Hi Reg,
First of all, congratulations on your
50th edition of the magazine. Its success and popularity is all due to
your enthusiasm and tenacity to provide an excellent journal for your
fellow modellers. I am sure they all appreciate it as much as I do.
Find attached the next WIP for my
Mustang . . .
Let me finally wish you and your family
a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
Happy Landings for 2002!
Thank you very much, Ian, your kind
comments and good wishes are really very much appreciated.
You will find Ian's latest progress
report and pics on his Mustang project on work in
progress.
|
| Grapher writes re Modelflight
50 . . .
. . . the real trouble with sites like
yours is that I sit there mentally adding to an already long list
of aircraft I'd like to build. For example, the D11, practically
any of Chris William's Slingsby models and either the Hannibal or the
1912 Blackburn. You are probably responsible for some extensively
stretched budgets and building time demands! At least I do get some
relief because I simply cannot transport models larger than say 78 inch
span in a single panel. Even with two piece wings I become limited
by the fuselage. That rules out some of the tasty ideas like the
Husky tug.
I am finding it increasingly difficult
to walk past my two "pipeline" projects in my workshop namely
the Cirrus Moth and the Widgeon. So the New Year may see
you getting some "under construction" shots.
When I acknowledged
the above, I mentioned to Geoff my interest in a Seagull ARTF of the
Pilatus, and he offered these helpful comments:
ARTFs- I have now had
two Piper Cubs, a Reichard Elipsoid (2.8 m electric soarer) and the
Twinjet. Of the Cubs, the first was World Models and structurally
excellent, built in China. The second was a Black Horse (never
heard of them!) kit and structurally disgraceful, built in Korea.
Neither were covered to anything like my required standard but the
Korean model was awful. I recovered 75% of it with Profilm which I
swear by.
So I advise careful
inspection of any ARTF model if you are (unlike me) lucky enough to be
able to buy from a local model shop. I'd never, ever buy another
Black Horse model. The Elipsoid was built in Czechoslovakia and
absolutely SUPERB quality in EVERY department. In that model I
could clearly discern the centuries of toy making skills for which
central European countries are famed.
Thanks, mate! Nice
to know we might see more of your projects in the New Year. |
|
There must be lots you can write to ModelFlight about, so click on the
e-mail icon at the bottom of this page and
get in touch!
I assume that you are happy for me to publish any
of your correspondence to me, unless you specifically request otherwise!
If you write to me at ModelFlight, I will automatically add
your e-mail address to my mailing list to send you a brief reminder each
time a new update is uploaded to the web. If you do not want to receive
the reminder, please let me know and I will ensure that your address is
excluded from the list.
|
|