|

| There are still many flight-simmers
who are happier with Microsoft Flight Simulator 98 than the
newer FS2000 and they will doubtless be delighted to hear
that VFR Scenery Ltd have announced that their long-awaited
scenery add-on for FS98 covering England and Wales is now
available. Development has also begun on a companion product
covering Scotland and Ireland.
The intention has been to improve on the widely-acclaimed scenery
produced by The UK Design Team, therefore both countries have
received major re-works of virtually all features to provide an even
greater level of detail and accuracy.
The scenery add-on can be purchased direct from VFR Scenery Ltd
and full ordering details are given on their website at http://www.vfrscenery.com/ -
including on-line ordering. The price is £21.99 including postage
and packing to UK addresses, +£2 to addresses outside the UK.
Here's some mini-pics to give you a taster of this new scenery: |
Cosford
arrival |
The River
Severn |
Swansea |

| Patch #2 for
FS2000 - which was issued and then temporarily withdrawn, I believe
- is now available for download from http://www.flightsim.com/ and
it should also be on www.microsoft.com/games .
It fixes various known issues and will bring the program up to its
latest version. This update incorporates all the improvements that
were in the first update, along with new improvements. Be
warned though, the files are big - the one for FS2000 Professional
Edition is 8.88 MB and therefore takes some time to download! Once
you've downloaded, though, the file is self-installing when you run
it. |
| Among the
many detailed little bugs that have been nailed, the new fix means
that FS2000 now includes shadows for aircraft, buildings and dynamic
scenery. Problems with some aircraft gauges have been addressed,
steering sensitivity has been adjusted for all aircraft and
improvements have been made to some of the navigational
aids. |

| In
Modelflight #6 I brought you news of the new Airport 2000
Volume 2 scenery from Wilco Publishing. I think I mentioned, though,
that all the wonders of this award-winning software were likely to
come with a price, i.e., slow frame rates.
Peter James (of www.flightsim.com)
- a much-respected flight-simmer and reviewer of flight-sim software
- has found the slow frame rates caused by Airport 2000 to be so bad
that he considers the product to be virtually impossible to use and
he has published a very hard-hitting criticism of it.
The following is an introduction to
his criticism which you may find of interest:
Due to the recent release of Wilco's Airport 2000 Volume 2, I
have to say that I am very upset that scenery designers so well
respected and idolized as Wilco, choose to "over-design" their
scenery so that no one can run it. My review here shows my distaste
for scenery that runs at 5 fps on a Pentium III 500.
I received many letters from dissatisfied customers who tried out
Airport 2000 Volume 2, only to find the same thing I did. You cannot
fly it!
Sure, it looks good in places, with many details, but unless
you're planning on taking screen shots for fun, you will not be able
to experience it as pilots do. I was told by one person who wrote
me, his PIII 800 only gave him 8 to 10 fps. This is horrendous for
flying! I for one will never rally around a scenery no matter how
great it is, if I cannot achieve at least 12 fps while taking off
and landing. It becomes a chore just to fly at less than that |
and you'll never enjoy all the
effort and hard work that went into the scenery in the first place.
I saw frame rate wars first hand, as Lead Designer of Flight
Unlimited III. There is always give and take and the bottom line
that we experienced was that nothing below 15 was acceptable. There
are many detailed and "new generation" sceneries out there that
provide the same visual candy excitement as Airport 2000, but
without the frame rate loss. If you check our file libraries, you'll
notice many freeware sceneries of stunning quality, with an
acceptable amount of frame rate hit.
I read reviews of all
flightsim products on other sites as well, and I for one am tired of
people either not being honest about a review or the lack of actual
flying done to test a scenery. Judging from the responses I've
gotten lately in my email, a majority of you agree with me. It is
time all of us let our talented and dedicated designers out there
know we don't want you to over-build your creation. Use some
discretion and test fly what you're building and ask yourself "would
I want to fly around this?".
Great scenery is a good balance
between frame rate and eye candy. Placing too much candy in
front of the pilot will destroy the effect the designer is trying to
achieve and will sour the flying experience! Then you know what
happens? Default FS2000 scenery looks better every time! |
Peter
James' full review also criticises some of the aircraft included
with Airport 2000 Vol 2. Not surprisingly, Wilco Publishing have
responded to his comments and the full review and Wilco's response
can be found on http://www.flightsim.com/cgi/kds?$=main/review/air2000v2.htm
|

| ModelFlight is keen to hear from you if
you have any contributions to make on the subject of flight
simulation, including the dedicated model flight simulators that so
many of us use as a teaching/training aid. E-mail me
now! |

|